OpenAI's Reply to Elon Musk Lawsuit Against the Company and Sam Altman

Elon Musk sued OpenAI and Sam Altman over breaching the contract and building AGI. Elon claimed that AGI can be dangerous for humans. Now, OpenAI replied with a post published on OpenAI Blog. In this post, OpenAI revealed several emails sent by Elon Musk that favor AGI development and for-profit business.

Elon Musk's emails to OpenAI teams and Sam Altman reveal that the company intended to go for-profit. Also, emails clearly state that Elon Musk is aware of AGI technology and the funding required for that.

OpenAI Reply to Elon Musk Lawsuit Against the Company and Sam Altman: eAskme

OpenAI Reply to Elon Musk's Lawsuit Against the Company and Sam Altman:

Here is what you must know:

Elon Musk, OpenAI and AGI:

On 22nd November 2015, Elon Musk sent this email to Greg Brockman saying that they need more than $100m in funding to avoid being hopeless. Google and Facebook were also spending massive amounts of dollars on developing AI technology.

In his email, Elon stated that it is best to start with $1 billion in funding.

In 2017, OpenAI realized that they need more funding every year to make AGI possible. The company was calculating the amount of funds required to develop AGI.

Elon Musk, OpenAI, and Less Open AI Technology:

On 2nd January 2026, Ilya Sutskever sent an email to Elon Musk, Greg Brockman, and Sam Altman that making AI development open would cause hard takeoff. In her email, she said that open-sourcing everything will drive the development of unsafe AI.

In his reply, Elon Musk only said, "Yup."

Elon Mush, Open AI, and for-profit Business:

On 31st January 2018, OpenAI sent an email to Elon Musk, explaining that Google has more resources like Deepmind, Google Brain, Cloud, TensorFlow, Research, and TPUs.

In its email, OpenAI said that publishing research in the Open and helping for free will make things worse. This is where the company thought about going for-profit.

For-profits can help the company raise more funds and develop AGI without disclosing information to the public. OpenAI wants to attach itself to Tesla as a cash cow.

Elon Musk Left OpenAI:

On 26th December 2018, Elon Musk sent an email to Ilya Sutskever, Greg Brockman, and Sam Altman explaining his retreat from the company.

In his email, Elon explained that his assessment of OpenAI being better than Google or Deepmind AI is zero.

There is a continuous need for billions of dollars every year.

Conclusion:

Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman reveals many things that were not in the public domain. Elon claims that he wanted OpenAI to stay as a non-profit. AGI and for-profit businesses are against the original commitment.

OpenAI's post that revealed emails between Elon Musk and OpenAI told that Elon knew from the beginning that OpenAI would become for-profit and needed billions of dollars in investment to develop AGI.

While this post reveals something, we still have to wait and see what will happen with the OpenAI lawsuit.

OpenAI is already facing a lawsuit from The New York Times.

The company is attracting multiple lawsuits.

Stay tuned to know more and stay updated.

More is coming!

Stay tuned with us.

Don't forget to join the eAskme newsletter to stay tuned with us.

Other handpicked guides for you:

• OpenAI Claims NYTimes Hacked ChatGPT for Copyright Lawsuit
  
• Bench Craft Company Facing Lawsuit
  
• What is Flutterwave Scandal?
  

>

OpenAI Claims NYTimes Hacked ChatGPT for Copyright Lawsuit

NYTimes-OpenAI Copyright Lawsuit is in progress. NYTimes filed a lawsuit claiming that OpenAI uses the news content without copyright. OpenAI claimed that The New York Times used OpenAI in a way that violates the terms of use.

OpenAI Claims NYTimes Hacked ChatGPT for Copyright Lawsuit: eAskme

OpenAI Claims NYTimes Hacked ChatGPT for Copyright Lawsuit

OpenAI claimed during court filing that The New York Times had used someone to hack ChatGPT and use it in unethical ways. This is the infringement of “terms of use.”

OpenAI's attorney asked the judge to dismiss part of the copyright lawsuit. In the new claim, OpenAI said that NYT hired hackers to use ChatGPT in unethical ways.

OpenAI lawyers want to dismiss four occurrences of copyright infringement lawsuits.

New York Times Hired Hackers to Hack OpenAI for Copyright Lawsuit:

OpenAI claimed that the NY Times had hired hackers to hack ChatGPT. How they have used ChatGPT differs from how a normal user uses the OpenAI tools. It is a Copyright violation.

The lawyers claimed that the truth would come out sooner or later. The New York Times has violated the terms of use and use of deceptive prompts.

New York Times reached the maximum lengths to generate “verbatim content.” NYT explained a bug that OpenAI has already addressed.

There is not threat to new industry as the OpenAI tools are getting popular.

OpenAI claimed that the New York Times hired someone to misuse ChatGPT and generate verbatim messages.

Further, OpenAI claimed that NYTimes is monopolizing the rules of language and facts. Using news content to train AI models is not copyright infringement.

OpenAI Claims and Consequences:

Transformative use of content if not copyright infringement. AI models already use content from other websites, user interactions, etc., to learn human conversations and text.

If the OpenAI claim is valid, the New York Times will be in awe. If the claim made by the NY Times is valid, OpenAI will face a hard time in the court battle.

Conclusion:

OpenAI and New York Times Lawsuit has been moved to a legal battle, and the New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI. OpenAI has filed its claim requesting to dismiss part of the lawsuit.

What do you think?

Let me know via comments.

Stay tuned with us to get the latest updates about the New York Times lawsuit.

New York Times lawsuit is not the first famous lawsuit. Here are more.

Stay tuned with us for more helpful content that can impact your life.

Don't forget to like us FB and join the eAskme newsletter to stay tuned with us.

Share this post with your friends and family.

Stay tuned with us to know more.

Don't forget to like us FB and join the eAskme newsletter to stay tuned with us.

Share this post with your friends and family.

Other handpicked guides for you;

• 23andMe Lawsuit! $6 billion to $0. Stock Delisting as Hackers Sold User Information.
  
• The Bench Craft Company USA Lawsuit
  
• Verizon Lawsuit Settlement

>

Bench Craft Company Lawsuit: The Missing Pieces, Allegations, Negotiations, Verdict,

Bench Craft Company Lawsuit has been talked about in the industry for a very long time. Industrial disputes are not a new thing. But surprisingly, something is there that played a key role in marketing the "Bench Craft Company Lawsuit." The biggest culprit was the company's unethical advertising policies. It teaches us the importance of consumer protection laws, business transparency, and the need for quality products. The lawsuit also displays how businesses can mend law and ethics for their profit.

BenchCraft Company was an online marketing and advertising firm based in Oregon, USA. The company gained the attention of the public when multiple people filed a collaborative lawsuit against the business.

It was reported that Bench Craft Company is using misleading ad practices for their golf course clients.

Bench Craft Company Lawsuit: The Missing Pieces, Allegations, Negotiations, Verdict,: eAskme

The unafraid and deceptive practices made people file a lawsuit against the Bench Craft company. It was reported that Bench Craft is spreading misleading information about its services and products. This has caused financial loss to many victims.

The lawsuit against the Benchcraft Marketing company has ruined its reputation forever. Today, I will reveal every hidden detail about the Bench Craft Company Lawsuit. You may have missed the key players, allegations, negotiations, lawsuit phases, results, and conclusions.

Let's first understand the Bench Craft Company:

Bench Craft Company Portland office is responsible in this case. This US-based company is known for its advertising and marketing skills. Bench Craft specializes in Golf Course ads. Not only that, but the company has worked with multiple clients in different industries. Bench Craft company has made its name within the golf course industry.

Bench Craft Company has successfully generated thousands of leads for its clients over the years. Their success in marketing and advertising had earned them a good name. Bench Craft Company became the Master of Advertising for local businesses. They were using scorecards, books, tee boxes, signs, and many other tools to make their ads effective.

With their excellent golf course ads, Bench Craft Company has made its connection with many high-profile clients. There was a time when Bench Craft Company became the most trusted name to advertise golf business.

BenchCraft Company has earned its name, built connections, and improved its reputation. But there was something else hidden behind the curtain.

It came to light that there were many fraudulent contracts under Bench Craft Company's table. By using misleading ad practices, Bench Craft advertising company was trying to attract the maximum population of its clients.

So, it was the time for a lawsuit with allegations.

Bench Craft Company Lawsuit and Allegations:

Decisive business practices damaged Bench Craft Company's reputation. There were many allegations in the lawsuit, such as unethical marketing and advertising. BenchCraft Company victims have complained that the company has misrepresented the products and services in their ad campaigns. The only reason was to earn more ad clients, but it caused financial loss to many, including social and economic stress.

There are 5 major allegations in the Bench Craft Company lawsuit:

1. Unethical Trade Practices: The first allegation was that Bench Craft Company was using unethical or misleading business practices to loot its clients and even its customers.
2. Misrepresenting products and services: This was a major allegation against the Bench Craft Company. The company was wrongly presenting products and services in their ads to lure customers.
3. Negative Marketing Practices: Bench Craft Company has lured customers to use advertised products and services.
4. Unfair and Biased: Another allegation was that Bench Craft had made contracts with many small businesses that were biased and unfair. These contracts only favored Bench Craft Company, the advertising company.
5. Breach of Contract Terms: Bench Craft victims have complained that the company has failed to deliver the results promised in their contracts.

Both businesses and customers have started noticing the decisive behavior and unfair business practices of the company.

It was the time when "Bench Craft Company" started facing issues.

The Bench Craft Company lawsuit key players:

There were 3 parties involved in the American Bench Craft Company lawsuit:

Plaintiffs/Victims:

The business has allegations on the Bench Craft Co. that they were not delivering the services on time. Also, the Bench Craft Company's business practices were against the law and the customers.

Bench Craft Company:

Bench Craft Company is the accused in this lawsuit. The main accusations are a breach of contract and decisive business practices.

Attorneys of the Both Parties:

Both parties hired attorneys and law firms to support their cases, collect evidence, and win the lawsuit.
Bench Craft Company's lawsuit was not a simple case. It entered 3 phases before it reached its conclusion.

3 Phases of the Bench Craft Company Lawsuit USA:

Class-Action Lawsuit:

A class-action lawsuit is when the majority of the victims join in one case against the company or firm. The number of complaints increases, and it becomes hard for the respondent to deal with everything in one go.

Bench Craft Company Défense:

Bench Craft Company's response to allegations was that they were not using any decisive business practices. Any issue in delivering the services has happened due to natural reasons such as market fluctuations or changes in user interest.

Settlement between Bench Craft Company and Plaintiffs:

A lawsuit has damaged the Bench Craft Company's reputation. Rather than fighting in court, the company has decided to talk about the settlement. It's been years since Bench Craft Company has been facing this lawsuit. There is still a lot going on in the case, and it will take to resolve the issue.

What Happened to the Bench Craft Company Negotiations?

Negotiations will only happen when both parties agree to make a court settlement. They need a mediator who can set the terms of the negotiation, and both parties can agree to that. In the Bench Craft Company lawsuit, it doesn't seem easy.

Neither the company nor the plaintiffs have made any announcement about the negotiations.

If only one party tries to negotiate, then it will surely fail.

Bench Craft Company and its victims are still waiting for the final verdict.

Aftermath of Bench Craft Company Lawsuit:

Bench Craft Company's lawsuit has changed the marketing and advertising business. It has displayed the stress and financial loss people can face when a company badly handles them. This lawsuit has also ruined Bench Craft Company's reputation, which they have built over the years.

The American Bench Craft Company lawsuit has also Shaken the trust of small businesses who trusted their advertising companies. It has made businesses keep an eye on marketing firms and their business practices.

This American lawsuit has made companies aware of business transparency, clear contact terms, and how to make a business accountable.

Bench Craft Company Lawsuit FAQ's:

Who has Won the "Bench Craft Company" Lawsuit?

BenchCraft Company lawsuit in its final phase. Both the parties are waiting for the final verdict.

What has changed since Bench Craft Company's lawsuit?

Small businesses are choosing their marketing partners carefully. I also checked the daily reports and practices of ad companies.

What is Your Takeaway from the Bench Craft lawsuit?

Check every business and their business practices before hiring them.

Conclusion:

The Bench Craft Company lawsuit has changed the advertising and marketing industry for good. The companies closely monitor new business transparency, ethical business practices, and customer satisfaction.

Reputation is everything in any business. And you can earn a good reputation when you care about your customers and your clients. Follow the best business standards to win the trust of both.

Decisive business practices can damage your reputation and cause a lawsuit.

Always follow the best business practices.

Do you want more?

Don't forget to like us on Facebook and sign up here to get the latest updates.

Share it with your friends and family.

>

23andMe Lawsuit! $6 billion to $0. Stock Delisting as Hackers Sold User Information.

23andMe Holding Co. is facing multiple lawsuits and a possible delisting from US stocks. It is an American biotechnology and genomics company. Hackers access the user data of 23andMe and sell that data with Jewish heritage. For almost five months, the 23andMe company had not detected a data breach. It gave access to hackers with malicious intent to steal user data and target Jewish users.

Here is what you must know about 23andMe company, lawsuit, and possible stock delisting.

23andMe Lawsuit! $6 billion to $0. Stock Delisting as Hackers Sold User Information: eAskme

23andMe Holding Co.:

23andMe Holding Co. is a US-based biotechnology company. Its headquarters is in San Fransisco, California. CEO Anne Wojcicki founded 23andMe Holding Co. in 2006.

23andMe Holding company site explains that the company is into DNA testing for ancestry, health, etc. The company has 14 million customers. 23andMe also collected the users' family tree information. Information like names, date of birth, location, relationships, etc., is available on the 23andMe website.

23andMe company went public in 2021. The company’s share price was $16 before the hacking news came out.

23andMe Holding Co. and Hackers:

Hackers have attacked the 23andME company website and stolen the data of nearly 7 million users. Hackers may leak DNA ancestry data online.

Wired reported that some 23andME users’ data leaked online on BreachForums, a hacking forum. Hackers claimed to access over 1 million data points about Jewish users.

Hackers are selling 23andME user profile information for $1-$10 per account. The 23andME leaked user information reveals the genetic ancestors such as Arabic or Europeans.

The company has told TechCrunch that the data breach happened five months ago, and they failed to detect the breach.

23andMe Lawsuit:

23andMe is facing three dozen lawsuits. Twenty lawyers have filed suits against 23andMe company. On 2nd February 2024, 23andMe lawyers will meet the other party who have filed lawsuits.

It is expected that 23andMe holding company attorneys will try to make a global settlement with other lawyers.

The 2023 hack has damaged the 23andME company’s reputation.

23andMe company and Nasdaq:

Nasdaq has threatened 23andMe company about possible delisting. The company's share value has fallen from $16 to $0.76.

23andMe’s CEO Anne Wojcicki:

While the news of the data breach leaked online, the company is facing multiple lawsuits; Anne Wojcicki is planning to change the company from an ancestral data company to a healthcare company. The next focus is to sell medications and health reports.

Conclusion:

23andMe is facing multiple lawsuits after the massive data breach that the company was not able to identify for five months. The company’s failure to identify and fix data breaches has caused data leaks to 7 million users online. Hackers are selling 23andMe holding company’s data online. 23andMe’s stock value went down to 0.76 cents. Nasdaq has also threatened 23andMe about possible delisting from the US stock market.

Stay tuned with us to know more.

Don't forget to like us FB and join the eAskme newsletter to stay tuned with us.

Share this post with your friends and family.

Other handpicked guides for you;

• Flutterwave Scandal to Success!
  
• The New York Times Lawsuit
  
• Verizon Lawsuit Settlement

>

Flutterwave Scandal to Success!

• 2000 investors filed a lawsuit against Flutterwave fintech company, Africa’s massive payment technology company.
• Flutterwave has collaborated with 86 Football Technology as a sports betting company.
• The company had defrauded investors of $12.04 million.

Flutterwave has made a name as Africa's leading fintech solution but faced a complete year with these allegations. The company became the unicorn of online payment solutions in Africa.

Despite the allegations and lawsuit, Flutterwave successfully expanded its business into the USA and Europe. Investors like Microsoft, Token io, and Audiomack started strategic partnerships with Flutterwave.

Let’s learn about Flutterwave, Scandal, and its journey to success.

Flutterwave Scandal to Success: eAskme

Flutterwave:

Flutterwave is an African fintech company running an online payment system.

Flutterwave CEO is Olugbenga Agboola. With new investors from the USA and Europe, the company is now gaining access to 13 markets in the USA.

Flutterwave works with brands like Uber, Netflix, Microsoft, Token, Audiomakc, etc.

What is Flutterwave Scandal?

Flutterwave Scandal came to light in 2022. The company was facing a massive list of allegations, such as security breaches, sexual harassment, mismanagement, and operational and ownership issues.

Flutterwave allegations are not limited to misbehavior and mismanagement; there are also allegations of insider trading. Former Flutterwave employee Clara Wanjiku Ordero has posted on Medium and X (Formerly Known as Twitter.) She also accused Flutterwave CEO Olugbenga Agboola of sexual harassment.

Allegations have put the reputation of Flutterwave at risk. These allegations also reflect the discomfort and employer-employee relationships in the company.  

Even though Flutterwave was facing too many allegations about its operations, it is believed that the company will easily manage to get rid of bad press and grow in the future due to its importance in the African economy and business systems.

Flutterwave satisfies the maximum volume of clients and investors. It is the reason that the company will not fail even after the allegations.

Other issues with Flutterwave:

• Flutterwave accounts in Kenya with $200 million were frozen due to money laundering allegations. But now, the case has been withdrawn, and they can access these funds.
• The company accounts were hacked, and $3.6 million was stolen from customer money.

Flutterwave’s new collaborations:

• On 6 June 2023, Flutterwave announced the collaboration with Token.io to enter into the European and UK markets.
• On 21 July 2023, another announcement was made detailing a collaboration with Audiomack, an American music-streaming website.
• 22 July 2023, Flutterwave signed a 5-year agreement with Microsoft to improve Azure transactions in Africa.

Conclusion:

Fultterwave has successfully managed to save its reputation due to its influence on the African economy. The fintech unicorn, Flutterwave, is the leading African payment system expanding its branches in the U.K., USA, and Europe.

The company has also fixed issues within the management and system to avoid future problems.

Flutterwave Scandal is not the first one. Here are more.

Stay tuned with us for more helpful content that can impact your life.

Don't forget to like us FB and join the eAskme newsletter to stay tuned with us.

Share this post with your friends and family.

Other handpicked guides for you;

• The New York Times Lawsuit: NYTimes vs. OpenAI and Microsoft
  
• Verizon Lawsuit Settlement: How You Can Claim $100 Million
  
• Bench Craft Company Lawsuit Explained
  

>

The New York Times Lawsuit: NYTimes vs. OpenAI and Microsoft

The New York Times lawsuit against AI giants OpenAI and Microsoft Corporation was filed on 27th December 2023. The New York Times has also uploaded 69 pages of complaint pdf on its website.

In response to the New York Times Lawsuit, OpenAI said that the lawsuit is without merit and that the New York Times is not telling the whole story. The OpenAI said that The New York Times used manipulative prompting techniques to misuse ChatGPT.

Why did the New York Times launch a lawsuit against OpenAI? What was wrong with OpenAI and Microsoft? What is Microsoft and OpenAI doing in response to this lawsuit?

Here is what you must know.

New York Times Lawsuit:

The New York Times Lawsuit: NYTimes vs. OpenAI and Microsoft: eAskme

The New York Times has filed a complaint against OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement. The lawsuit claims that OpenAI and Microsoft use New York Times articles and content to train their AI technologies, such as GPT-4.

With this lawsuit, The New York Times became the first US-based Media company to sue AI companies over copyright work.

New York Times has not made any monetary demand in its lawsuit but said that copying Times content had caused damage worth billions of dollars.

The Times has tried to make a deal with OpenAI and Microsoft about using intellectual properties. But there was no resolution.

Where did the New York Times file the lawsuit?

The Times has filed a lawsuit in the Federal District Court of Manhattan, and its lawsuit New York Times stated that Microsoft and OpenAI have used millions of The Times articles to train their AI chatbots.

New York Times article shared the details of this lawsuit.

The NYTimes claimed that ChatGPT is producing exact copies of The Times articles. It is against the fair use of content.

According to the United States Copyright Office, The Fair use of Copyrighted content means the freedom of expression by allowing other parties to use your content without license.

The New York Times uploaded 69 pages pdf on its website.

OpenAI is using content without consent, and it is not fair use.

Microsoft has not made any comment.

OpenAI Response to New York Times Lawsuit:

In response to the “New York Times Lawsuit” article, OpenAI also published an article stating, "The New York Times lawsuit is without merit.”

On the other hand, OpenAI said they are shocked by the lawsuit as discussions are going on with The Times.

The AI giant said that OpenAI Output is not producing the exact copies of the content. New York Times misused ChatGPT to produce disputed results and called It “Adversarial Prompting.”

What is Adversarial Prompting?

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT block prompts that let users misuse the tool. Yet, many areas and prompts can produce malicious intent or misleading results.

When a person generates unintended AI outputs, then it becomes adversarial prompting.

OpenAI openly accuses the New York Times of using Adversarial Prompting to generate copyrighted content with GPT-4.

Adversarial Prompting is against OpenAI policies:

• You cannot use ChatGPT to produce misappropriate and infringes.
• You cannot use GPT to disrupt services.

OpenAI Accuses The New York Times of Using Manipulated Prompting:

OpenAI claimed that the NYTimes used manipulated prompting practices to generate verbatim results. They also said that the New York Times had used Adversarial Prompting intentionally.

With this practice, the New York Times has violated the terms of use and misused GPT.

The New York Times Vs. OpenAI and Microsoft: Lawsuit Continues

The New York Times lawsuit is telling two stories from both parties. Where the NYTimes is claiming that GPT-4 is using their content, OpenAI claims that the New York Times is misusing ChatGPT.

Conclusion:

OpenAI vs New York Times lawsuit is just the beginning. We are still waiting for Microsoft’s response, as Microsoft is also the party in the lawsuit. No matter what happens, this lawsuit will open the door to improvements in generative AI and explore the threats.

Stay tuned with us to get the latest updates about the New York Times lawsuit.

New York Times lawsuit is not the first famous lawsuit. Here are more.

Stay tuned with us for more helpful content that can impact your life.

Don't forget to like us FB and join the eAskme newsletter to stay tuned with us.

Share this post with your friends and family.

>

Verizon Lawsuit Settlement: How You Can Claim $100 Million? Allegations, Negotiations, Settlement

Verizon's lawsuit is coming to an end with a $100 million settlement. And you can cash it also.

Verizon is offering a settlement to get rid of the lawsuit where plaintiffs claimed that Verizon Wireless had charged allegedly. There was an additional “administrative charge” added to monthly bills that made them pay extra money unnecessarily.

Customers complained that Verizon has never notified them or explained the additional charges.

Now, a $100 million settlement is here.

But before you go to claim your share. Here is everything you must know about the Verizon Lawsuit and settlement.

What is the Verizon lawsuit?

Verizon Lawsuit Settlement: How You Can Claim $100 Million? Allegations, Negotiations, Settlement: eAskme

Verizon Wireless started charging its customers an additional fee in the name of “administrative charges.” The company never bothered to ask for the customer’s consent before adding these charges.

Lawyers of Verizon customers filed a lawsuit against the company explaining the unlawful charges in customers’ bills.

Not only current but also many former Verizon customers have filed the lawsuit.

Verizon’s Response:

Verizon has never clearly responded about the details of the additional charges. Also, the company has charged higher in the bills than what was advertised.

Even though Verizon denied these allegations, the company tried to stay away from making any public comments.

The Verizon Lawsuit key players:

There were 3 parties involved in the American Verizon Wireless Company lawsuit:

Plaintiffs/Victims:

Verizon customers complained about the wrong administrative charges in their bills.

Verizon Company:

Verizon Company is the accused in this lawsuit. The main accusation was the excessive charges in the bills.

Attorneys of the Both Parties:

Both parties hired attorneys and law firms to support their cases, collect evidence, and win the settlement.

Why is Verizon Paying $100 million to customers?

Verizon wants to save its reputation and time. Paying $100 million is an easy way to get out of the lawsuit.
The company is ready to pay eligible customers who have been charged wrongly without consent.

Who is Eligible to Get Payout from Verizon Settlement?

Customers who have been charged wrongly in their postpaid bill between January 1, 2016, and November 8, 2023, are eligible to get payback from Verizon lawsuit settlement.

How Much You Will Get from Verizon Lawsuit Settlement?

Verizon is paying $100 million to its customers, but it doesn’t mean that you will be a millionaire with this.

You will only get between $15 to $100. The amount you receive depends upon the length of time you have been charged.

How Can You Claim the Settlement Money?

How to file a claim online?

If you are an affected Verizon customer, then you go to the claims website and file a compensation request. Only eligible customers will get an email with an online portal link to file the claim.

How do you file a claim offline?

You can even file an offline claim. Download the form and print it. Please fill in all the details and mail them to the given address.

What is the Verizon Lawsuit Claim Filing Deadline?

The last date to file a claim is April 15, 2024. After April 15, you will not be eligible for claim and compensation. Also, the customers will lose the right to file lawsuits again.

How to Get Out of the Settlement?

You can opt out of the settlement if you have any other claims that are not mentioned in the class-action lawsuit against Verizon. 

You should sign an exclusion request to opt out of the settlement before February 21.

Verizon Company Lawsuit FAQ's:

Who has won the "Verizon Company" lawsuit?

There is a settlement between Verizon and its customers.

What has changed since Verizon Company's lawsuit?

Verizon customers are checking their bills to find any unnecessary charges.

What is Your Takeaway from the Verizon lawsuit?

Businesses want to save their reputation. A $100 million settlement is an example of that.

Conclusion:

Verizon is not the first company to face a class action lawsuit. Companies like Bench Craft Company Lawsuit is still going on.

Stay tuned with us for more helpful content that can impact your life.

Don't forget to like us FB and join the eAskme newsletter to stay tuned with us.

Share this post with your friends and family.

>